Enterprise System Spectator blog: ERP and enterprise system vendor evaluation, selection, and implementation.

The Enterprise System Spectator

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

The disruptive power of open source

Zack Urlocker, from MySQL, an open source database developer, called my attention to his blog, where he has been discussing the open source business model as disruptive to traditional software license vendors.

His first post is a good basic explanation of the definition of a disruptive technology.
What makes something disruptive is making it more convenient, simpler, more flexible and sometimes, making it cheaper. Often, for a business to be disruptive it requires a different business model. Sometimes the business model itself is the source of the innovation. The idea of getting DVDs in the mail may not seem radical today; but if you're Blockbuster and you've built your entire revenue on thousands of retail stores, its hard to wrap your head around using a web site to send DVDs out by mail.
In his second post, he goes on to discuss disruption in the software industry, specifically. I agree with everything Zack as written, but I found his comments regarding MySQL, specifically, to be noteworthy:
[MySQL] gets deployed on a lot of niche applications, like web sites, ecommerce, data warehousing, reporting, custom applications and telecommunications infrastructure. And those niches are growing faster than the rest of the database industry.

Typically, MySQL does not replace the existing legacy databases in organizations. In fact, many of our customers are also users of Oracle, SQL Server and DB2. But they use them in different areas. As Charles Phillips from Oracle said a while back: Oracle and MySQL are both in the transportation business. But Oracle is a 747 and MySQL is a Toyota.
He goes on to discuss some specific innovations taking place now at MySQL:
At MySQL, we have long focused on using disruption as a way to make our customers' lives easier. The first stage focused on making developers' lives easier with a no-nonsense database that was easy to use, reliable and fast. The second stage was the introduction of MySQL Enterprise and the Monitoring & Advisory service that makes the DBA's life easier. And now the third stage is to make the IT Buyer's life easier. We are doing that by announcing today something we call MySQL Enterprise Unlimited.

For $40K (the price of a single CPU of Oracle) you can get an enterprise wide use of MySQL Enterprise, with production 24x7 support and unlimited use of the MySQL Network Monitoring & Advisory Service for a year. For customers that are used to spending $1 million or more on closed source licenses, this is a heckuva good deal.
It will be interesting to see how the major software vendors, such as Oracle, view MySQL's further incursions into the enterprise space. One of the characteristics that Zack doesn't mention is that incumbent providers typically don't take the threat of disruptive providers seriously. At first, their technology is viewed as primitive, or even as a toy (think of the Radio Shack TRS-80 PC that first started popping up here and there in corporate settings). The disruptive technology, at first, is only of interest at the low end of the market, the segment that the incumbent vendor has the most difficult time servicing and is the least profitable. But over time, as the disruptive technology improves, it begins to move up-market, eating into the segments where the incumbent vendor really makes money. This has certainly been the case with Linux, which at first was viewed as a hobbyist operating system and now runs enterprise applications. The same thing, hopefully, may be happening with MySQL.

Zack makes good points. (His blog is also a good example of what other software vendors--open source or traditional--should be doing with blogs to better communicate with their customers and the general technology community. Tone down the PR-speak, and just talk to people.)

Related posts
Oracle plans free version of database
Oracle bid for Innobase a threat to MySQL?
Why organizations choose open source software
Key advantage of open source is NOT cost savings
Open source: turning software sales and marketing upside down

by Frank Scavo, 1/30/2007 08:26:00 AM | permalink | e-mail this!

AddThis Feed Button

 Reader Comments:

Post a Comment
 

Links to this post:


 

Powered by Blogger

(c) 2002-2008, Frank Scavo.

Independent analysis of issues and trends in enterprise applications software and the strengths, weaknesses, advantages, and disadvantages of the vendors that provide them.

Read more: "About the Enterprise System Spectator"

Frank Scavo Send tips, rumors, gossip, and feedback to Frank Scavo at . I'm especially interested in hearing about best practices, lessons learned, horror stories, and case studies of success or failure.

Selecting and implementing a new enterprise system can be a difficult decision. My consulting firm, Strativa, offers assistance that is independent and unbiased. For information on how we can help your organization make and carry out these decisions, write to me.



AddThis Feed Button


Go to latest postings

Join the Spectator mail list!
Email:
Receive new articles (max once per week).
Easy one-click to unsubscribe anytime.

Search the Spectator:

Computer Economics
ERP Support Staffing Ratios
Outsourcing Statistics
IT Spending & Staffing Study
IT Staffing Ratios
IT Salary Report
IT Security Study
Trends in IT Security Threats
The Computer Economics Report (newsletter)

Get these headlines on your site, free!

More links
Strativa: ERP software evaluation and implementation consulting
35MM Design: Web design, Los Angeles
CISO Handbook
Open Source Strategies

Top 50 Analyst Blogs

TechWeb Readers Choice blog finalist



Spectator Archives
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
Latest postings