Enterprise System Spectator blog: ERP and enterprise system vendor evaluation, selection, and implementation.

The Enterprise System Spectator

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Software vendor consolidation and buyer concerns

Oracle's aggressive acquisition strategy is just the latest evidence of a consolidation trend underway in the software industry. In the enterprise applications space, players such as SSA Global have also been primary consolidators.

One might think, therefore, that the software marketplace will ultimately consolidate around a handful of large vendors, which will enjoy economies of scale and offer long-term stability and one-stop shopping.

But M.R. Rangaswami of the Sand Hill Group argues that the enterprise software market is still open for other players.
The perception that customers want to buy everything from a single vendor--however warranted--is idealistic. Once a single software vendor manages everything, the customer is beholden to that vendor. Smart CIOs know this--and are hedging their bets. They are balancing the right amount of business they give one vendor with the need to keep that vendor honest and serving them well. This fact ensures that small and mid-sized best-of-breed vendors will always have a place in the enterprise technology lineup.
Rangaswami is touching a point that I feel strongly about: the balance of power between sellers and buyers of commercial software. (I'll let the reader guess where my sympathies lie).

Vendor power over the customer is especially troublesome in the enterprise software market, where customers are making a decision that will tie them to the vendor for many, many years. Once a customer implements an enterprise system, it is extremely difficult to undo that decision. Vendors know this, and some of them act like they own the customer, treating them like a captive audience. This explains, in part, the overall low level of customer satisfaction in the applications software industry. In most other industries, satisfaction levels like this would put a supplier out of business.

Yes, CIOs want fewer vendors to manage, and they want the stability and continuity of service that a larger vendor can offer. But they don't want to give up too much power in the relationship. As much as possible, they want to control their own destiny and preserve their freedom to choose.

In my opinion, the need to maintain freedom is driving several trends in the enterprise software industry that seemingly have nothing to do with one another. It is behind the popularity of Linux and open source. It is behind the trend toward open standards and service-oriented architecture, which should allow buyers to mix and match software components from different vendors. It is behind the rise of third-party maintenance organizations that provide an alternative to the vendor's own support services. One could even argue it is one factor behind software on-demand (or, software as a service), where the buyer does not need to make a huge up-front commitment to the vendor.

The vendor consolidation trend will no doubt continue, and it needs to continue. There are still too many weak performers. But that doesn't mean that the door is closed to new entrants, especially those that offer new and innovative solutions to real problems and commit themselves to customer service.

Related posts
Executives hesitate to recommend their ERP vendors
Key advantage of open source is NOT cost savings

by Frank Scavo, 9/20/2005 08:54:00 AM | permalink | e-mail this!

 Reader Comments:

I'm helping a large financial services intermediary choose a software vendor for operations service support (incident, problem and change management). This collapsing vendor list (Oracle/Peoplesoft/Siebel, HP/Peregrine) is good news and bad news. It makes the choosing easier. As the vendors consoldiate, each vendor has a broader offering. At least that's the sales pitch. Of course, under-the-covers it's still an aggregation of unintegrated (unintegratable?) parts.

On the other hand, when just a few big vendors serve a market, they work hard to make their products un-integratable, so, there's no hope of a best-of-breed solution. Also, there's the tilt in power toward the seller, as Frank points out.

A little voice in the back of my head is telling me that this collapse is a big deal. When hardware companies start buying category leading software companies you can bet on two things. One, the software company will never be heard from again. Remember Clarify? Remember the names of the many software companies purchased by SUN? Hardware salesmen simply give away the software to try to make the hardware sale. Since no revenue is attributed to the software, no further development or meaningful support is offered. How about that IBM software?

Two, when the category leading software companies are acquired and the little vendors are left out, that's the end of the category until the next technology wave. In this case the next technology wave seems to be hosted/on-demand/ASP'd/call-it-what-you-like. Some analysts are saying that Oracle bought Siebel to get their hosted SFA service acquired from Upshot.com. But, the old-guard never (hmmm...never?) jump on the new technology wagon successfully. Remember those SFA packages that ran on mini-computers?

You've got to wonder when Mercury and BMC will be acquired. Once consolidation like this gets started, all the players look for buyers. BMC is crap, so probably SUN will buy them. Mercury is better, so maybe CA buy them. The rest of the vendors are financial lilliputians that won't get past my client's finaicial viability test?

So, what next?

If we look at the hosted/on-demand/ASP'd/whatever vendors there is only one financially strong pure-play vendor; salesforce.com ($2.5b market cap, ticker=crm). But, they don't offer anything like the features and functions we need.

My fear is, three years from now, after my client and I have picked software and implemented it across all 3000 users and hundreds of tasks and dozens and dozens of processes, the software will be unsupported. The package vendor will no longer invest in further development. On the other hand, the community-development approach Salesforce.com has taken, akin to the open source community in it's structure, could produce astonishingly fast product evolution. That could lead to a good enough product within the next 3 years.
What we are seeing here as a trend is the emergence of a different approach to software development. The Cathedral and Bazaar by Eric Raymond predicted it back in 2000. You can easily see this in a few business solutions just emerging (SugarCRM, Compiere and Asterisk just to name a few). These are solutions which have proved to be of enterprise grade quality, without the lock in factor from the vendors. This lock in, trying to be forced by the current business solution vendors, is against market rules, the market rules normally react slowly, but decisively against factors that do not comply with them.
The consolidation that we see in this industry segment will only accelerate this next wave.

Ramiro Vergara
Post a Comment

Links to this post:


Powered by Blogger

(c) 2002-2018, Frank Scavo.

Independent analysis of issues and trends in enterprise applications software and the strengths, weaknesses, advantages, and disadvantages of the vendors that provide them.

About the Enterprise System Spectator.

Frank Scavo Send tips, rumors, gossip, and feedback to Frank Scavo, at .

I'm interested in hearing about best practices, lessons learned, horror stories, and case studies of success or failure.

Selecting a new enterprise system can be a difficult decision. My consulting firm, Strativa, offers assistance that is independent and unbiased. For information on how we can help your organization make and carry out these decisions, write to me.

My IT research firm, Computer Economics provides metrics for IT management, such as IT spending and staffing benchmarks, technology adoption and investment trends, IT management best practices, IT salaries, outsourcing statistics, and more.

Go to latest postings

Search the Spectator!
Join over 1,700 subscribers on the Spectator email list!
Max. 1-2 times/month.
Easy one-click to unsubscribe anytime.

Follow me on Twitter
My RSS feed RSS News Feed

Computer Economics
Outsourcing Statistics
IT Spending and Staffing Benchmarks
IT Staffing Ratios
IT Management Best Practices
Worldwide Technology Trends
IT Salary Report


2014 Best Independent ERP Blog - Winner 2013 Best ERP Writer - Winner Constant Contact 2010 All Star Technobabble Top 100 Analyst Blogs

Key References
Strativa: Business strategy consulting, strategic planning
Strativa: IT strategy consulting
Strativa: Business process improvement, process mapping, consultants
Strativa: IT due diligence
Strativa: ERP software selection consulting and vendor evaluation
Strativa: CRM software selection consulting and vendor evaluation
Strativa: Project management consulting, change management
StreetWolf: Digital creative studio specializing in web, mobile and social applications
Enterprise IT News: diginomica

Spectator Archives
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
September 2012
October 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
September 2013
October 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
February 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
January 2017
February 2017
May 2017
June 2017
October 2017
January 2018
April 2018
May 2018
Latest postings