Enterprise System Spectator blog: ERP and enterprise system vendor evaluation, selection, and implementation.

The Enterprise System Spectator

Friday, April 09, 2010

Plex Online: pure SaaS for manufacturing

As software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers continue to prosper against traditional on-premise enterprise software vendors, I've been frustrated by the lack of SaaS solutions for manufacturing companies. There are a number of SaaS providers of CRM solutions, HRM and other point solutions, of course, that can work for manufacturing firms. But where is there a complete ERP, deployed as SaaS, for manufacturing operations?

Let's look at some possibilities:
  • NetSuite is true SaaS, but not a fit for most manufacturing companies, as by NetSuite's own admission, it targets services businesses and lacks many fundamental features for manufacturers such as standard costing, shop scheduling, capacity planning, and MRP. (A promising start-up, Rootstock, is building extended manufacturing functionality on top of NetSuite's platform, but it is a new effort and only now being rolled out beyond its initial beta customers).

  • Workday is another true SaaS provider, with ambitions to be a full ERP replacement. But like NetSuite, Workday will not target manufacturing companies. Today, Workday only offers HRM and some financial systems functionality.

  • The on-premise ERP industry leader, SAP, has its Business ByDesign (BBD) offering, which has been stuck in beta for years. But like NetSuite, BBD is not targeting manufacturing companies. Furthermore, its initial deployment was as a single-tenant system (a separate instance of BBD for each customer), not a true multi-tenant SaaS offering, which services many customers on a single instance.

  • Other on-premise ERP providers, such as Oracle, Microsoft, Lawson, IFS, and so on, are missing-in-action when it comes to SaaS for manufacturing. The most they offer are hosted versions of their on-premise software, like Lawson does. When they do offer true SaaS, it is only for niche functionality, such as CRM, as an adjunct to their on-premise software.
To my knowledge, there is only one true SaaS provider that offers a complete ERP solution today for manufacturing companies, and that is Plex Online, from Plex Systems.

Plex's PR folks have been after me for a long time to give me a briefing. I finally took some time today and spoke by phone with Mark Symonds, Plex's President and CEO. Here are some of the key points from our discussion.

Why so few SaaS solutions for manufacturing?
I asked Mark, why there are so few complete SaaS solutions for manufacturing firms? He responded that he wished there were more, as it would validate the delivery model Plex provides. He also indicated the difficulty for traditional on-premise vendors, those that have the domain knowledge, to transition to SaaS. It's not easy to completely rearchitect an on-premise solution to a multi-tenant model. In addition, giving up the initial license fee model for a subscription model, which usually goes with SaaS, is a financial disincentive for the on-premise providers to make the switch.

Plex was fortunate, however, in that when they first re-architected their formerly on-premise system to SaaS, they were able to keep new customers paying up front license fees. This allowed them to fund their development, until Plex converted to a subscription model a few years ago.

What about green-field SaaS providers that don't have an installed customer base to contend with? Well, manufacturing systems are not an easy place to start, as they are a super-set, to use Mark's term, of what's required for services businesses. Which may explain why the pure-play SaaS providers have started with the services sector.

Is Plex really pure SaaS?
The term SaaS is thrown around so much these days, I wanted to ensure that Plex Online was a true multi-tenant system. Mark assured me that it is. The system was developed beginning in the year 2000, and all new features are implemented once in the system for all customers, who can choose to "opt in" to the new functionality according to their needs. Plex also allows a high degree of configuration for individual customers and provides a visual composition environment to allow customers to create their own custom displays and reports.

The Plex literature does not call attention to the technology platform, but I did determine that the system is built on Microsoft technologies. There is a Microsoft SQL Server database on the backend, with Active Server Pages as the original development platform. New functionality being developed in C#.net. Having started development ten years ago, the technology platform appears a bit of a hybrid and a bit dated in spots, in my view. But, it works.

Plex currently runs two instances of the system, for load balancing purposes--which is not uncommon among other SaaS providers, such as Workday. I was impressed that MS SQL Server is able to scale to this degree, with hundreds of customers on each instance, and Mark indicated that scalability has not been a problem. The client user interface is all browser-based, utilizing HTML, dHTML, Javascript, and XML. The hardware platform is all HP Wintel servers.

Support for large manufacturing organizations
I had heard from Plex's PR folks that the company has recently been having some success selling into larger organizations, over $1 billion in revenue. I was interested to find out whether these represented true multi-facility, multinational organizations, or whether these were merely plant-level implementations where a traditional on-premise vendor was handling the primary corporate requirements (i.e. a two-tier ERP strategy).

Mark assured me that some of these were complete ERP replacements (although Plex is working with some larger organizations in a two-tier ERP strategy as well). For example, Inteva Products is a company of 3,600 with 17 facilities on three continents. Originally a part of Delphi Interiors, it spun off in 2008 as a separate company. Looking to replace its SAP system, Inteva chose Plex Online. The implementation in 14 global locations took just twelve months. It's a good story and an "existence proof" that Plex can address companies of this size.

The challenge of international requirements
I've seen manufacturing firms struggle with systems that do not truly support multiple facilities for material planning and costing. Is Plex a true multi-facility system? Mark indicated that Plex does allow a single company to run a separate material plan for each plant and to transfer material between plants with correct accounting for costing methods that may differ between plants.

Multinational companies may need to set up multiple tenants within Plex, but these are to accommodate different tax and regulatory requirements (localizations) not for multi-facility requirements. On this point, I questioned how Plex, as a small vendor, was able to support localizations for so many international locations. Localizations are currently provided for Mexico, Canada, China, German, the UK, and Japan ("to some extent"). Mark's response indicated that localizations are handled on an opportunistic basis--when a customer needs them, they provide them with support from Plex's partners, such as Plante & Moran , BDO Seidman, and Baker Tilly.

Prospects considering Plex should not assume, therefore, that Plex can handle all international requirements. Be specific on what's required and be prepared for Plex to propose additional time to develop the localizations needed.

Dealing with medical device and pharma manufacturers
I was especially intrigued by Mark's claim to be addressing the needs of life science companies. Based on my experience dealing with FDA regulatory requirements, I was interested to know if Plex was able to address buyer concerns about demonstrating control of system configuration. Normally, buyers have little or no say about how or when a SaaS provider makes changes to a multi-tenant system. Mark indicated success in this area, by giving customers the ability to "opt in" to system changes, as discussed earlier, and by submitting to customer qualification of Plex as an approved vendor. Plex's certification of its operations as compliant with SAS 70 Level II also helps.

My take
Whatever Plex is doing, it seems to be resulting in some good financial performance over the past three years. As a privately held firm, Plex does not publicly report performance. But Mark indicated 33% growth in the top line for 2008, 14% for 2009 and a good outlook for 2010. In a timeframe when nearly all on-premise enterprise software providers are showing negative license sales growth, Plex's results are outstanding.

Do I have any concerns about Plex as a provider? Only that buyers should check functional fit. Plex's roots are in the automotive industry, though it is now expanding into other areas such as life sciences, food and beverage, and aerospace/defense. The functional footprint may have some gaps, depending on the industry. Due diligence is always advised. The ability to support international requirements in specific locations should also be verified, as discussed earlier.

That said, I think Plex is on the right track. I only wish other SaaS providers would address the needs of the manufacturing industry.

Update, May 10: Fellow Enterprise Advocate Dennis Howlett provides his take on Plex. Dennis delves into many details I didn't go into, so please read his post.

Related posts
Lawson's cloud services: good start, but no SaaS
Workday pushing high-end SaaS for the enterprise
NetSuite a viable alternative for SAP customers?
SaaS contingency plans need more than software escrow

by Frank Scavo, 4/09/2010 01:58:00 PM | permalink | e-mail this!

 Reader Comments:

In case you are planning on building, there are enablers like Platform as a Service, Pre-built SaaS Solution Accelerators and 3rd party subscription-based billing solutions can accelerate SaaS development for ISV’s at the free webinar hosted @ http://www.aspiresys.com/events/current-events/rapid-saas-development.html
I keep reading the comments made by many people on ERP solutions. Let me make one comment the reason there is low level of satisfaction in so far as ERP is concerned is because people are still looking for an ideal solutions. Please for a second go back to manual system where solutions were designed by the people in the operation and not by IT people who have very little idea of operation hence so far from satisfaction. Customers’ requirement has to be made available by the people on the job and not by IT people who just know the software technology. Manufacturing is difficult because you have to be involved in manufacturing if you want to understand how it works. It is complicated because it requires technical understanding and actual headlining of cost, logistics, dynamic planning process and so on.
Dr Aloke Chakravartty
Management Consult
Dr Chakravartty, thank you for your comment. I believe there is much truth in what you wrote. On the other hand, I have seen companies where "manufacturing systems" have been designed/implemented by the manufacturing folks with little or no integration with the rest of the organization. So we really need a balance between the users of the system designing the system and the needs of other groups within the organization that have need for the information.

The problem is that very few users have an "enterprise view"--they just see their own needs. Yet, as you point out, if you leave the design to the IT folks, they often miss the real needs of the users. It is a real problem.

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger

(c) 2002-2018, Frank Scavo.

Independent analysis of issues and trends in enterprise applications software and the strengths, weaknesses, advantages, and disadvantages of the vendors that provide them.

About the Enterprise System Spectator.

Frank Scavo Send tips, rumors, gossip, and feedback to Frank Scavo, at .

I'm interested in hearing about best practices, lessons learned, horror stories, and case studies of success or failure.

Selecting a new enterprise system can be a difficult decision. My consulting firm, Strativa, offers assistance that is independent and unbiased. For information on how we can help your organization make and carry out these decisions, write to me.

My IT research firm, Computer Economics provides metrics for IT management, such as IT spending and staffing benchmarks, technology adoption and investment trends, IT management best practices, IT salaries, outsourcing statistics, and more.

Go to latest postings

Search the Spectator!
Join over 1,700 subscribers on the Spectator email list!
Max. 1-2 times/month.
Easy one-click to unsubscribe anytime.

Follow me on Twitter
My RSS feed RSS News Feed

Computer Economics
IT Spending Ratios by Industry and Company Size
IT Spending as a Percentage of Revenue by Industry, Company Size, and Region
Outsourcing Statistics
IT Spending and Staffing Benchmarks
IT Staffing Ratios
IT Management Best Practices
Worldwide Technology Trends
IT Salary Report


2014 Best Independent ERP Blog - Winner 2013 Best ERP Writer - Winner Constant Contact 2010 All Star Technobabble Top 100 Analyst Blogs

Key References
Strativa: Business strategy consulting, strategic planning
Strativa: IT strategy consulting
Strativa: Business process improvement, process mapping, consultants
Strativa: IT due diligence
Strativa: ERP software selection consulting and vendor evaluation
Strativa: CRM software selection consulting and vendor evaluation
Strativa: Project management consulting, change management
StreetWolf: Digital creative studio specializing in web, mobile and social applications
Enterprise IT News: diginomica

Spectator Archives
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
September 2012
October 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
September 2013
October 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
February 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
January 2017
February 2017
May 2017
June 2017
October 2017
January 2018
April 2018
May 2018
January 2019
February 2019
Latest postings